Most of the educators about studies had been formal Enneagram coaches on the Narrative Traditions. This new Enneagram Circuit training Programs made use of five pri type of panels, (2) didactic discovering, (3) reflection exercises, and you may (4) experiential exploration. Enneagram Intense Classes educators implemented an overview called The Enneagram Intense®: Partnering Mental Lifestyle and Heart.
The 3 Basic classes incorporated pri discovering modalities. The newest Berkeley path included informal Enneagram style of panels and didactic discovering. The newest Minnesota movement used all four of one’s first studying methods. The latest Palo Alto direction made use of Enneagram variety of panels, didactic studying, and experiential mining such as for instance guided visualization.
Studies Data
Questionnaires were wrote because of the a research secretary and you will sent to a good Cook-Greuter-specialized SCT scorer (Hy and you can Loevinger 1996) through blog post post. Code quantity were utilized and so the rater is actually blind in order to the kind of the sample, the times of sample, together with knowledge classification variety of. The fresh new scorer adopted the training from the Susan Prepare-Greuter, making use of the original Loevinger manual, apart from stems beyond the manual (Cook-Greuter 1999). Scored solutions was indeed sent back on scientists into the a be noticed spread sheet that has been next useful for studies studies. To make sure precision of your rating to possess causes which players went up or off several amounts, an example of these knowledge has also been scored by the Get ready-Greuter by herself.
Efficiency
An analysis of variance (ANOVA) confirmed that there were no pre-existing ego development differences at baseline among the participants between the sites, F(8, 9) = 0.38, p = .93. The pretest and posttest ego development scores were significantly correlated (r = .48, p < .001), whereby participants with higher pre-training scores also had higher post-training scores.
Because there are a great deal more over the age of more youthful adults inside decide to try, a diagnosis try presented to check on the connection anywhere between age bracket and you can training impact. In total, forty professionals (33%, n = ) enhanced one or more degree following the degree. Proportionally, a whole lot more fifty–59 12 months olds (45%, n = ) versus almost every other age range increased a minumum of one degree immediately after the education (20% https://www.datingranking.net/daddyhunt-review, n = 1/5, under 31; 0%, n = 0/step three, 30–39 season olds; 25%, n = 7/twenty-eight, 40–44 year olds; and you will 24%, n = 8/33, 60+ seasons olds). To examine if or not that it trend are mathematically extreme, a ? 2 sample off freedom was determined because of the contrasting many years group and you can whether a person knowledgeable ego stage development of you to definitely or more levels following the input (or perhaps not).
An analysis has also been conducted to evaluate the connection anywhere between fellow member intercourse and you can knowledge perception. Although proportionally, a great deal more girls (36%, letter = ) than simply people (18%, letter = 4/22) complex one or more amounts after the education, a great ? 2 sample away from freedom revealed zero matchmaking between gender and you may pride innovation.
Two repeated-measures ANOVAs were conducted to test for within-subject ego development changes across the training sites. The first model examined the interaction term of ego development by training site type as a dichotomous variable (intensive site vs. introductory site); the model was not significant at the p < .05 level, F(1,120) = 1.32, p = .25. The second model examined the interaction term of ego development by individual training site; the model was also not significant at the p < .05 level, F(7, 114) = 1.40, p = .21.
Paired sample t tests were conducted to examine whether there were significant changes in ego development scores before compared to after the Enneagram training interventions at each site. Data revealed that the Asheville 2005 participant group showed a significant increase in ego development scores following the intervention, t(22) = ? 3.36, p < .01. Table 4 sument scores and the paired t test results.